The Baku Ceyhan Campaign
About the Baku-Ceyhan campaign
What you can do
More info

- What is planned

- Colonialism

- Human rights and conflict

- Social development

- Climate change

- Environmental impacts

- BP's pipeline record

- What are these international financial institutions?

- Map of the project

- The companies involved

News & updates
Campaign publications
Links

Financial institutions involved in the pipelines

BP and its partners intend that the US$ 3.3 billion cost of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline should be financed 30% by equity (capital provided by the oil companies which hold shares in the project), but primarily 70% from debt (loans from banks). A large proportion of this debt will be sought from public financial institutions (ie lenders of taxpayers’ money), led by the International Finance Corporation (IFC – the part of the World Bank which lends to companies rather than governments) and the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development (EBRD).

[What are these international financial institutions?]

In November 1998, BP boss John Browne stated that the BTC / AGT project would not be possible unless such "'free public money' was offered by government to build the line."

In October 2001, BP and its partner oil companies sent a preliminary informative memorandum on the project's financing requirements to the IFC, the EBRD and leading export credit agencies. Both IFC and EBRD have informally indicated a willingness to provide financing. Export credit agencies that have been discussed in relation to the project include US-EXIM and OPIC, the UK's ECGD, Italy's SACE and Japan's JBIC.

No formal application has been made as yet – BP is aiming to submit this in December 2002, if all goes to plan. There would then be a 120-day ‘disclosure period’, during which time anyone is welcome to make comments and raise concerns to the institutions. The institutions’ boards would make a decision after the end of that disclosure period.

If you would like to be notified of when this disclosure period begins, and how to make comments to the financial institutions, please join our mailing list.

Since no formal application has been made, it is not officially declared what amount of money will be applied for. However, it is informally believed that IFC and EBRD would each be asked for US$ 300 million. MIGA (the World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency) is reportedly being asked for $200 million in political risk insurance to cover the commercial banks lending to BP (these have not been named yet - BP would use the insurance to solicit commercial bank loans). US export credit agency OPIC has been approached for $300 million in political risk insurance. Further guarantees are sought from other export credit agencies.

Links:

Multilateral development banks:

IFC – the International Finance Corporation, the private-sector lending arm of the World Bank

EBRD – the European Bank for Reconstruction & Development

Export credit agencies:

ECGD – the UK’s export credit agency

EXIM – the US export credit agency

JBIC – Japan’s export credit agency

OPIC – the US export credit agency

SACE – Italy’s export credit agency

Other financial institutions:

MIGA – the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency of the World Bank

Non-governmental organisations / campaign groups:

Bank Information Center

Bretton Woods Project – critical voices on the World Bank and IMF

Campagna per la Riforma della Banca Mondiale

CEE Bankwatch Network

ECA Watch – international NGO network working on export credit agencies

Friends of the Earth International IFI campaign

Friends of the Earth USA IFI campaign

The Corner House – resources on export credit agencies