|
NEWS
Friday 26th September
2003
Public
bank in pipeline protest
Legal statements of villagers presented
Environment and human rights campaigners will target a key City
bank on Friday, urging it not to give taxpayers' money to an oil
pipeline from the Caspian Sea to Turkey.
The protest
will take place at the European Bank of Reconstruction and Development
(EBRD), which a BP-led consortium has approached for public funding
for its Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. The planned $3 billion pipeline
would pass through 1,000 miles of Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey.
[1]
On Friday protesters
will present legal testimonies of 34 people affected by the pipeline,
who have joined a legal challenge to the project through the European
Commission. [2]
Last month the
European Commission announced that it would investigate human rights
abuses arising from the pipeline project. This followed a complaint
by environment and human rights groups and Kurdish villagers affected
by the project, claiming that the legal agreements for the project
break Turkey's accession agreements for entry into the European
Union. [3]
Kerim Yildiz,
Director of the Kurdish Human Rights Project, commented,
"These statements are just the tip of the iceberg, and more
are coming in every day. Pipeline companies have not consulted the
people who will be harmed by the project. Until this is rectified,
it must not receive public funding".
Kate Geary,
of the Baku Ceyhan Campaign, said,
"Consultation on this project has been a sham. Since neither
BP nor EBRD has consulted properly, we are bringing affected people's
views to them".
The EBRD is
owned publicly, by its member countries, and was set up to support
economic and democratic transition in former Soviet Bloc countries.
The UK's vote on whether to back the project is one of the biggest
issues currently facing Secretary of State for International Development,
Valerie Amos.
Tony Juniper,
Director of Friends of the Earth, commented,
"This pipeline is designed to boost BP's profits at the expense
of local people and the environment. Taxpayers' money should be
used for social development and for clean energies, not for dirty
fossil fuel projects which worsen climate change".
James Marriott,
of PLATFORM, added,
"This project will harm local economies, by damaging farmland
and threatening Georgia's vital mineral water production. It will
undermine democracy, through draconian legal agreements that restrict
the host governments' ability to regulate. If EBRD decides to back
this project, it will be contradicting its mission of supporting
democracy and economic development".
Notes for editors
1: 70% of the
estimated $3bn cost of the pipeline is projected to come from external
funding, led by the EBRD and the International Finance Corporation.
The IFC, part of the World Bank, is also using public money.
2: For example,
one of the statements reads,
"The pipeline
goes through my village and my own lands. The construction company
which is going to build the pipeline, made me sign the papers they
put in front of me without having a detailed meeting about it. I
do not speak Turkish as a mother tongue/native since my mother tongue
is Kurdish. They spoke to me in Turkish therefore I did not understand
quite a lot of the things they told me. While my lands were being
expropriated, I was not given any detailed information about the
project. I was not given the opportunity to bargain on the amount
they offered either."
The testimonies
are all available on request.
3: In a letter
(available on request), dated 4th August 2003, to the Kurdish Human
Rights Project, the EC's Directorate of Enlargement states:
"Turkey
has undertaken to comply with the EU accession criteria, including
the Copenhagen political criteria on democracy, the protection of
human rights and of minority rights. For this reason, any human
rights or national minority rights violations arising from the implementation
of the above mentioned Pipeline Project would have to be seen in
the context of the Copenhagen political criteria. The Commission
will continue to follow closely the developments in Turkey surrounding
this case and give an assessment of the human rights and minority
rights situation in its regular report in November this year."
|